Monthly Archives: December 2014

The FINRA CMA Fee – Can it be Waived?

By | |
Leave a comment

FINRA CMA FeeIn 2012, FINRA announced that it would begin charging a fee for continuing membership applications (or CMAs). Also, at that time, FINRA announced increases in the new member application (or NMA) fees. The FINRA CMA fee structure for both is based on a grid that appears in Section 4(i)(3) of Schedule A of the FINRA By-Laws. The problem here for FINRA is that for years it processed CMA applications (and spent considerable resources on some) without actually collecting any fees for this specific service. Wanting to recover some of the resources it was expending on CMAs, FINRA instituted these user fees in 2012.

The amount of the required FINRA CMA fee depends upon a tiered structure within each firm category (small, medium and large). And the tiers, for example, of a small firm are Tier 1, 2 and 3 where the first is 1-10 registered persons, the second is 11 – 100 and the third is 101 – 150. The fees within each tier for a small firm seeking to gain approval for a material change in business range from $5,000 to $15,000. For a large firm these fees range from $35,000 to $75,000. Some fees are simply a flat fee (no tiers) – for example there is a flat fee for an asset transfer of $5,000 for a small firm. Essentially, FINRA has aligned the fees with what it anticipates the amount of work required by its staff will be.

Then Comes the Clarification on FINRA CMA Fee Waivers

In 2013, acknowledging that there are certain circumstances in which CMAs should qualify for a fee waiver, FINRA issued guidance about what these circumstances are and how to apply for the waiver. Specifically, an applicant may be granted a FINRA CMA fee waiver where FINRA, “determines that the CMA is proposing less significant changes that do not require substantial staff review.” And FINRA went on to provide guidance suggesting that the applicant may qualify for a FINRA CMA fee wavier in the following instances:

  • The proposed change does not make any, “day-to-day changes in the applicants business activities, management, supervision, assets or liabilities, and the applicant is only proposing a change in the:” applicant’s FINRA CMA Feelegal structure (corporation to LLC), ownership structure (adding a holding company), and change of percentage ownership of existing owners with no disclosure or disciplinary issues within the last 5 years.
  • An asset transfer application in which there are no pending or unpaid settled customer related claims, or there are claims but an escrow has been established.

Obviously, the FINRA CMA fee-waiver eligibility circumstances are very limited. But in FINRA’s Regulatory Notice 13-11, it states that other changes may qualify based on the individual facts and circumstances of such a waiver request. And FINRA has granted waivers in other circumstances.

A FINRA CMA fee wavier request should be uploaded into the FINRA Gateway with the Form CMA, and specifically in the section covering Standard 1 of the application. There have been instances in which the waiver request was completed after the application was filed, however.

If you are considering filing a CMA, or if you would like to request a waiver of any FINRA CMA fee, contact Mitch Atkins, FINRA’s former Senior Vice President and Regional Director, a FINRA CMA expert who has extensive experience with the FINRA CMA process.

Contact Mitch Atkins, Principal, FirstMark Regulatory Solutions at 561-948-6511.

FINRA BD Asset Acquisition

By | |
Leave a comment

FINRA bd asset acquisitionAs has been pointed out in the trade press in recent years, there have been numerous instances of broker-dealers going out of business for a number of reasons, not the least of which is being on the wrong end of an arbitration award. For small broker-dealers, an adverse arbitration award can be a devastating event. If not fully covered by insurance, it can mean the end of the broker-dealer. Since the SEC’s Net Capital Rule requires that broker-dealers book the entire amount of an adverse arbitration award upon receipt, an award in excess of that firm’s net capital requires the FINOP to direct the cessation of securities business except for liquidating transactions, and even those may only be effected by customers directly with the clearing firm. In a circumstance like this, the broker-dealer will likely want to wind down the business and transfer the brokers and accounts to another firm as quickly as possible. Sometimes a broker-dealer in this circumstance will attempt to sell its assets (and in terms of customer accounts and brokers, while not technically assets, they certainly represent valuable relationships).  This is called a FINRA BD asset acquisition.

FINRA has addressed scenarios such as this in NASD Notice to Members 04-10. In the Notice, FINRA (NASD at the time) points out that firms in this circumstance must file an application under Rule 1017 and must gain approval prior to effecting this type of transaction – one it calls an “Asset Transfer” or a FINRA BD asset acquisition.  FINRA expressed concern about this practice because –  remember FINRA’s mission is investor protection – it wants to ensure that customers who have arbitration awards against a broker-dealer are given priority in any sale or liquidation transaction. In the Notice, NASD said, “NASD has encountered several instances where the effect of a member attempting to restructure by transferring assets is to insulate the member and its owners from responsibility for payment of pending or unpaid arbitrations. In some cases, the member will transfer its assets without a corresponding transfer of its liabilities.”

In circumstances in which a broker-dealer is closing, it is possible to gain approval from FINRA, whether or not there is a payment for the assets being transferred. However, FINRA’s Rule 1017 process must be followed and FINRA satisfied that customer claims will be dealt with in as fair a manner as is possible under the circumstances.  This is a critical aspect of the FINRA BD asset acquisition and is discussed more in this article about FINRA Arbitration Plans. FINRA BD asset acquisition

Generally, this type of application is filed under Rule 1017(a)(3). The provision states that a Continuation of Membership Application, or CMA, must be filed in any instance in which there are, “direct or indirect acquisitions or transfers of 25% or more in the aggregate of the member’s assets or any asset, business or line of operations that generates revenues comprising 25% or more in the aggregate of the member’s earnings measured on a rolling 36-month basis, unless both the seller and acquirer are members of the New York Stock Exchange, Inc.”

UPDATE: See discussion of FINRA Notice 20-15 below. Note that while Rule 1017(a)(3) is still in effect, FINRA has amended its rules to require that if a member is contemplating any acquisition (even under the 25% threshold above) and the transferring member or an associated person of the transferring member has a “covered pending arbitration claim” an unpaid arbitration award or settlement, the member must file a materiality consultation prior to proceeding, again, even if under the 25% threshold that existed previously. Similarly, a member may not expand its business using the FINRA safe harbor for business expansion if that expansion includes one or more associated persons involved in sales who have a “covered pending arbitration claim” an unpaid arbitration award or settlement. Instead, it must first file a materiality consultation.

Don’t Have 180 Days for a FINRA BD Asset Acquisition CMA?

A FINRA BD asset acquisition application often is filed in urgent circumstances. Because the firm has ceased operations, the client services are limited. Firms often want to effect a mass transfer of representatives of the closed firm to a new firm. The new firm may also need to file a Rule 1017 application. Also, as is often the case in these scenarios, the broker-dealers involved will want to effect a block transfer of customer accounts using a negative consent letter. All of these scenarios require precise compliance with the numerous rules that are triggered. Further, there can be significant operational considerations.   In some instances, FINRA BD asset acquisition applications can be processed in an expedited manner.  There is the possibility of using the FINRA fast track membership application process.

UPDATE: On September 14, 2020, as outlined in FINRA Notice 20-15, FINRA has amended its Membership Application Program rules to create further incentives for the timely payment of arbitration awards. The existing MAP rules (FINRA Rule 1014) already required that FINRA consider whether the applicant and its associated persons have any material disciplinary actions taken against them by industry authorities, customer complaints, arbitrations, civil actions, etc. The amended rules include the following key changes:

  • FINRA now requires firms to seek Materiality Consultations when engaging in certain changes involving ownership, control, or business operations, including business expansions when an unpaid arbitration award or settlement exists;
  • There is a rebuttable presumption to deny a new member application that involves a pending arbitration claim against that applicant or its associated persons;
  • To overcome a presumption of denial due to unpaid arbitration claims or settlements, an applicant must demonstrate its ability to satisfy the awards settlements or claims and guarantee that any funds used to evidence ability to pay will used for that purpose; and
  • An applicant must notify FINRA of any arbitration claim involving the applicant or its associated persons that is filed, settled, awarded, or becomes unpaid before FINRA renders the decision on the application.

If your firm is experiencing circumstances like these, or if you desire to effect a FINRA BD asset acquisition contact a FINRA CMA expert who knows how to navigate these complex requirements in an expedited manner. Mitch Atkins, FINRA’s former Senior Vice President and Regional Director has extensive experience with the FINRA CMA process and particularly with asset transfers and broker-dealer acquisitions under Rule 1017(a)(3).

Contact Mitch Atkins, Principal, FirstMark Regulatory Solutions at 561-948-6511.

FINRA Interim Restrictions

By | |
Leave a comment

The FINRA Continuation of Membership Application (“CMA”) is covered under FINRA Rule 1017 (among others), and is often referred to as a “1017” application. The rule provides that any of the events enumerated in Rule 1017(a) require the filing of an application. Generally, these include: a merger, an acquisition, an asset acquisition, a change in ownership or control or a material change in business operations. For purposes of this discussion, we will focus on a change of ownership or control.FINRA Interim Restrictions

Generally speaking, the change of ownership or control provision of the rule is designed to allow the member to effect the transaction 30 days after filing the application unless FINRA objects (and an objection comes in the form of FINRA interim restrictions). In that case, FINRA must notify the applicant that it is imposing interim restrictions, which may include a prohibition on the member effecting the transaction until the completion of the processing of the application. This process is described in FINRA Rule 1017(c)(1).

The Basis for FINRA Interim Restrictions

When FINRA interim restrictions are involved, it is usually because FINRA has made a preliminary assessment that the applicant may not meet one or more of the standards in FINRA Rule 1014. Absent that view, FINRA interim restrictions generally won’t be imposed. This is not to say that if FINRA does not object that it has approved the transaction. However, based on a review of the details of the proposed transaction, FINRA may leave it to the applicant to determine whether it wants to proceed with the change.

The real risk to the applicant if it proceeds with the transaction prior to receiving FINRA’s approval is that FINRA may, after reviewing all of the material provided with the application, determine not to grant the applicant an approval. If this is the case and the applicant has already effected the transaction, it has limited choices: file a new application, unwind the transaction or file Form BDW and withdraw from FINRA membership. Clearly, this is not a scenario one wants to face.

When filing an application under Rule 1017, it is critical that the applicant consult with a FINRA CMA expert who is experienced in the process. Mitch Atkins, FINRA’s former Senior Vice President and Regional Director has extensive experience with the FINRA CMA process and particularly with FINRA interim restrictions under Rule 1017(c). Contact Mitch Atkins, Principal, FirstMark Regulatory Solutions at 561-948-6511 with your questions about FINRA’s CMA process.

FINRA CMA Application Rejected – Substantially Incomplete

By | |
Leave a comment

substantially incomplete rejected FINRAGaining approval of a material change in business or other type of membership application is dependent upon whether the standards for admission are satisfied. These standards are spelled out in FINRA Rule 1014(a). However, prior to evaluating whether the standards have been satisfied, FINRA will evaluate whether an application for membership (a “MAP” application) is “substantially complete” and if not, it may reject that application. FINRA Rule 1017(d) provides that FINRA must determine, within 30 days of receiving an application for change in ownership, control or business operations, whether that application is considered by FINRA to be substantially complete.  If not, FINRA will send a letter to the applicant notifying them of the substantially incomplete status.

A similar provision applies to new member applications and is spelled out in FINRA Rule 1013(a)(3). While the term “substantially complete” is not defined specifically in the rule, experience has shown that FINRA is generally quite generous when it comes to making that determination. The rules provide a period of 30 days from the date of filing for FINRA to make its determination. Should it decide to reject an application, the application is deemed not to have been filed at all. And, FINRA returns the application fee less $500. FINRA will also provide an outline of the reasons it viewed the application as substantially incomplete. An applicant will then be required to re-file the application once it has been further developed (along with the full application fee).

Even an application that is not rejected by FINRA as substantially incomplete can have serious issues if it requires substantial revision.  Submitting a complete application can significantly reduce its duration. Because the application process is complex and requires a major investment of time and resources, it often makes sense to involve a professional FINRA CMA expert to assist.

Mitch Atkins, FINRA’s former Senior Vice President and Regional Director has extensive experience with the FINRA membership application process and particularly with ensuring that applications meet the standards specified in FINRA’s Membership Rules. Contact Mitch Atkins, Principal of FirstMark Regulatory Solutions at 561-948-6511 with your questions about FINRA’s MAP process.